(Originally posted on Tuesday, 27 December 2011)
My rating:
8/10 (low re-reading value)
Please read my post from April 2009 to find
out about my rating.
Please read my post from May 2009 to learn about Glen Cook’s style of writing.
Right from
the first page I felt “Passage at Arms” would be an exceptional book. It starts in the middle
of tense combat on the surface of a planet, but the fighting is rather a
background than the main action. The most
important thing about this first chapter is the feeling it gave me. The
atmosphere is like a mix of the great science-fiction novel “Forever War” (two
alien civilizations clashing) and the great film “Terminator” (chaos reigning
during the fighting in the city ruins as seen in the “future flashbacks" of the soldier
Kyle Reese). Great stuff.
I must warn
you that the second chapter shows what was happening a couple of days before
the fighting from the first chapter and the action in all the following chapters takes place only in space, so the start of the novel can be misleading. At first I was angry, but after some time
I realised it was a touch of genius. The tone of the first chapter is simply
unforgettable.
What’s
good:
1. Glen
Cook’s style of writing.
2. This novel
is VERY, VERY, VERY gripping. It’s one of the most gripping books I have ever
read.
3. The story
is about one very long mission of a climber – a small space ship which is used
similarly to a submarine during The World War II.
4. Glen
Cook created great speculative science about climbers. Similarly to a submarine
going underwater, a climber goes into a different state of energy, virtually
vanishing from the normal space (it “climbs”). It leaves only a small trace in the
normal space and is reduced to a “Hawking point” which is very small and can’t
be hit directly by a missile. However nearby explosions of the missiles do harm
it by raising the temperature inside the climber. When the temperature is too
high the cooling system fails and the climber explodes because the antimatter
inside its tank cannot be controlled properly. Great idea.
5. The
atmosphere about living together for a long time in close quarters is good, but
it could have been done a little better. What’s really captivating it’s rather
the lack of patriotism of the more experienced crew and their only will to
survive this one more patrol. Glen Cook skilfully shows that a soldier after
prolonged tense fighting is not the same person as when he was joining the army
or when he was leaving his military school for real combat. Glen Cook also
shows how a soulless decisions of the higher command can ruin morale in any
unit.
6. This
book also shows how much depends on the captain of a (space)ship like this and
how much pressure is laid upon him. He has to carry on the orders of the higher
command without losing the respect of his own crew. He is the only person who
cannon crack an inch, because he holds the whole crew from falling apart.
7. There
are very good examples of how much the news about the ongoing war is manipulated
before reaching the people at home.
What’s bad:
1. I didn’t
like the idea that a spaceship which is moving so fast and is almost invisible
can be traced so easily.
2. The
fighting at some moments seemed too easy or simplistic.
3. The very
strange behaviour of the higher command toward the end of the book is not
believable or reasonable (at least for me).
4. This novel is too heavy emotionally for me to read it again.
The
speculative science of a climber is great, but could have been used somewhat differently
and the fighting could be better. I liked the science and the space battles in “The
Dragon Never Sleeps” more, but I must admit that “Passage at Arms” tells a much
more intimate story and is much easier to follow. Glen Cook created a unique
feeling about a climber and its crew. As I said it’s one of the most gripping
books I have ever read, but it's also exhausting emotionally. Considering its low re-reading value I still rate “Passage at Arms” as a novel more than just good.
(8/10)